INFLUENCE OF PARENTING STYLES ON THE ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF STUDENTS IN GOVERNMENT
INFLUENCE OF PARENTING STYLES ON THE ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF STUDENTS IN GOVERNMENT
CHAPTERONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background to the Study
Family is the fundamental
and important structure of the society that has an important role in one’s life
and in the society. The important of the family as a social structure is
something unmistakable. Although affected by society and peers, children are
more influenced by the family. The influence of the family on the children and
its role in academic achievement is very great and important.
Correct and balanced
relationship between parents and their children is one of the factors
influencing both their physical and mental health. Interaction between,
children and how parents communicate with their children are considered to be
the most important and fundamental factors among the various factors that affect
children’s development.
According to Ekanem (2004),
education of the child begins from the home. He observed the home as the
primary agent of socialization of the child. It is believed that the family
from which a child is brought up has an influence on his or her development and
academic achievement. The family is the natural entity that best protects
children and provides condition necessary for their development (Johnson 2007).
The child is entitled to
care, security and an upbringing that is respectful of his or her person and
individuality. The primary responsibility of the parents is upbringing and
developing the children. The parents also have the principal responsibility to
ensure the child an adequate standard of living. The social climate or environment
in which an individual finds him/herself to a large extent determines his/her
behavior, personality and academic achievement (Ekanem, 2004). Consequently,
parental guidance and discipline usually influence the behavior and academic
achievement of the child.
Bank (2004) found that
student’s academic achievement depends on the family he comes from. He observed
the family as the fulcrum around which the development of the child revolves.
The central figures in the family are the parents while child bearing and child
rearing cannot be divorced one from the other, the type of child rearing
practiced in a family, has a tremendous impact on the entire life of the child
including his or her academic life.
It is noticeable, that the
style of parenting adopted in a family can determine the academic achievement and
how the child will adjust to the society emotionally. Parenting style goes a
long way in determining how the child sees his or herself, perception
concerning physical, social and psychological aspiration.
INFLUENCE OF PARENTING STYLES ON THE ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF STUDENTS IN GOVERNMENT
1.2 Statement
of the Problem
Over
the years, students have been performing poorly in Government in Secondary
Schools in Etinan Local Government Area. This poor performance has been
attributed to many factors including; learning environment, gender,
socio-economic status of parents, and study habit of the learners among others
(Udoh, 2004). However, Udoh (2004) fail to relate the poor academic performance
of students in Etinan Local Government Area with parenting styles.
Therefore,
against this backdrop is this study seeking to investigate if the poor academic
performance of students in Government in Etinan Local Government Area can also
be attributed to parenting styles.
1.3 Purpose of the Study
The
main purpose of the study is to investigate the influence of parenting styles
on the academic performance of students in Government in Etinan Local
Government Area. Specifically, the study was aimed at the following:
(i) To
investigate the influence of Authoritative style of parenting on academic performance
of students in Government in Etinan Local Government Area.
(ii) To
investigate the influence of permissive style of parenting on academic
performance of students in Government in Etinan Local Government Area.
The
findings of the study will be significant to parents, teachers and students as
follows:
(i) It will
benefit parents in learning how their parenting styles influence their
children’s performance in school.
(ii) Teachers
will be made aware of importance of learning the parenting styles that a
student goes through in order to avoid poor performance.
(iii) The study
will also benefit other students in the field with the literature to support
their argument and hence improved knowledge.
1.5 Research
Questions
The
following research questions are formulated to guide the study:
(i) To what
extent does Authoritative style of parenting influence academic performance of
students in Government?
(ii) To what
extent does Permissive style of parenting influence academic performance of
students in Government?
INFLUENCE OF PARENTING STYLES ON THE ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF STUDENTS IN GOVERNMENT
1.6 Research
Hypotheses
The
following null hypotheses were formulated to guide the study:
(i) There is no
significant relationship between Authoritative style of parenting and good
academic performance of students in Government.
(ii) There is no
significant relationship between Permissive style of parenting and poor
academic performance of students in Government.
1.7 Limitation
of the Study
The
limitation experienced in the study was:
(i) Insufficient Finance: Insufficient
finance was one of the limitations to the study.
(ii) Time Constraint: As the time allowed
for the completion of the study was very limited.
(iii) Searching
for materials on subject under investigation also posed a problem.
1.8 Delimitation
of the Study
The
study was delimited to ascertaining the influence of parenting style on the
academic performance of students in Government. It was also delimited to all
the senior secondary schools in ml Local Government Area.
1.9 Definition of Terms
(i) Parenting Style: This is the different
ways of upbringing children.
(ii) Authoritative Parents: They are parents
who are responsive and they do not oppress their children directive options.
(iii) Permissive Parents: They are parents who
are nurturing and responsive to the child’s needs and wishes.
(iv) Academic
Performance: This is the test or examination scores, which is used to
determine the academic achievement of a student.
(v) Government: It is a science, which
studies human behavior as a relationship between ends and scarce means, which
have alternative uses.
CHAPTER TWO
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
The
review of the related literature to this study were presented under the
following sub-headings:
•
Conceptual Analysis of Parenting Style
•
Authoritative Style and Academic Performance of Students
•
Permissive Style and Academic Performance of Students
•
Summary of Literature Review
2.1 Conceptual Analysis of Parenting
Styles
Parenting
style is a psychological construct representing standard strategies that
parents use in their child rearing, It is the representation of how parents
respond and demand from their children (Spera, 2005). Parenting style
emphasizes on the response parents provide to their children and the method,
which parents used to demand, complains from their children. The method used by
parents in their child rearing, to a large extent can determine how the child
will adjust to the society emotionally (Bornstain, 2005). Parenting style is a
determining and effective factor that plays an important role in children’s
development and academic achievement (Jackson, 2006).
Bank
(2004) posited that the home is the fulcrum around which the development of the
child revolves. He added that poor or good academic performance of a child
depends on the type of parenting style adopted by parents. This is in support
of Ekanem’s view that social climate or environment in which a child finds
his/herself to a large extent determines his/her behavior, personality, and
academic achievement.
Parents’
role as an agent of socialization and education is a complex process. Ford and
Learner (2005) found that, parenting styles is the key to children’s academic
achievement and the self-concept of the children. However, Ekanem (2004)
pointed out that, parents should adopt a parenting style that will influence
their children’s academic performance positively. The parenting styles go a
long way in determining how the child sees his or herself, perception
concerning his or her physical and psychological aspiration.
According
to Jacobs and Harvey (2005), parenting style is one of the significant
contributors to students’ academic achievement. Baumrind (2000) categorized
parenting style parenting style based on two dimensions, which are
‘responsiveness’ and ‘demandingness’. According to Baumrind, responsiveness
refers to the degree that parents promote self-assertion and individuality by
showing care and acceptance to children’s desires. On the other hand,
demandingness refers to what the parents expect from their children.
It
is generally agreed that parenting style influences self-efficacy, self-
esteem, and identity development, which are associated with academic
achievement (Baumrind, 2008). In addition, the progress in children’s
achievement is influenced by the decision that is made by both parents and
their children to cooperate or confront each other.
Furthermore,
children’s academic motivation and behavior are directly influenced by family
activities and parents’ behavior, which are seen as the external factor. For
instance, there is a positive outcome for both parents and children when
parents interact in a fun and loving way during children’s homework time
(Morawska, 2007).
Conversely,
when parents are neglectful, academic disengagement and problem behavior are
generated (Brown, 2008). He added that, the foundation for parenting style and
academic achievement is formed by the belief systems and attitudes in parents
and their children.
2.2 Authoritative Style and Academic
Performance
Authoritative
parenting is more flexible style of parenting in which parents permit their
children considerable freedom, but are careful to provide reasons for the
restrictions they impose and will ensure that the children follow laid down
procedures. Authoritative parents are responsive to their children’s needs and
ideas and will often seek their children’s needs and ideas, and will often
their children’s view in family deliberations and decisions (Baumrind, 2005;
Weiss and Schwarz, 2006).
Baumrind
(2005) avers that, “unlike any other patter, authoritative upbringing
consistently generated competence and deterred problem behavior” (pp 91).
Authoritative
parenting has been found to be an essential factor in a student’s life. It has
been seen as the most effective in enhancing personal and social
responsibilities in adolescents, without constraining their newly formed
autonomy and individuality (Glasgow, Dornbush, Troyer, Steinber, and Ritter,
2005).
Authoritative
parents are assertive, but not intrusive and restrictive. Their disciplinary
methods are always supportive, rather than punitive since they want their
children to be assertive as well as cooperative.
Moreover,
authoritative parents reasonably attempt to direct their children’s activities
and use more warm control, positivity during communication, feelings-oriented
reasoning as well as induction, and more responsiveness to children’s questions
(Bornstain, 2005). According to Steinberg (2005) reveal that authoritative
parenting and parental involvement in school activities are positively
correlated with students’ school success.
Dornbusch
(2005) have found out that children raised by authoritative parents, when
compared with children raised by permissive parents have higher level of
academic performance in school.
According
to Anne et al (2008), authoritative parenting style is correlated with positive
psychological and behavioural outcomes. Pang et al, (2005) also found that
there is strong correlation between academic achievement and authoritative
parenting.
Interestingly,
children with authoritative parents reported higher grades in school
performance than children with permissive parents, and demonstrated stronger
school orientation, school engagement, and bounding with teachers than children
with permissive parents (Steinberg et al, 2007).
Wilson,
(2005) suggests that authoritative parents usually monitor and impact clear
standards for their children’s conduct.
Since
most of this studies were conducted in developed countries, and Dornbusch et al
(2007) have found that parenting styles vary across different cultures. For
example, authoritative parenting style was positively related to school grades
and students’ performance was higher in European American students, but
authoritative parenting style resulted in lower academic grades and, was not
related to the academic performance of Asian American students.
And
Blair and Qian (2002) found that authoritative parenting style was positively
associated with school performance of Chinese students.
It
is because of this mixed implication of authoritative parenting style on
academic performance of students from different cultures that this study sought
to find out whether authoritative parenting style has a positive or negative
influence on the academic performance of students in Government in mi Local
Government Area.
2.3 Permissive Style and Academic
Performance
Permissive
parenting style is a type of parenting style characterized by low demands with
high responsiveness. Permissive parents tend to be very loving, yet provide few
guidelines and rules.
These
parents do not expect mature behavior from their children and often seem more
like a friend than a parental figure. According to Baumrind (2005), Permissive
parents are more responsive than they are demanding. Permissive parents are
generally nurturing and communicative with their children, often taking on the
status of a friend more than that of a parent (Dodge, 2003). Parents, who
adopted Permissive style of parenting, highly accept their children and make
some demands for the children’s behavior.
The
parents allow their children fundamental self-regulation. Children of
permissive parents would be expected to have the greater risk for emotional and
behavioral problems (Dornbusch 2005). Permissive parents as explained by Barber
(2001) believe that they are responsible for making sure that their children
are happy.
Children
raised in permissive environments have low degree of self- reliance and social
competence as compared to those raised in authoritative environment (Steinberg
and Dornbusch, 2006). The risk of developing anti-social behaviours is often
attributable to permissive environment (Darling, 2000).
Consequently,
Patterson (2005) suggests that permissive parenting style is associated with
low academic performance and increased tendency to associate with anti-social
peers.
Reporting
on their research findings, Vandell and Posner (2003) noted that permissive
parenting style results in poor academic outcomes.
This
is in support of Baumrind’s (2000) view that, children of the permissive
parents have one of the worst outcomes on virtually any measure of social or
cognitive competence, academic performance, psychological well being, or
problem behaviour.
According
to Park (2002), there is a negative association that exists between permissive
parenting style and academic achievement. Several studies have documented the
negative impact of permissive parenting style on academic achievement.
They
indicated that parental permissiveness is associated with lower academic
achievements. (Amato and Gilberth, 2000; Slicker, 2004; Steinberg, Dornbusch
and Brown, 2007).
Dornbusch
(2005) observed that when parents adopt the permissive style of parenting,
their children display several predictable outcomes.
Firstly,
these children are the most at risk for becoming spoiled children. They tend to
grow up thinking that they should always get what they desire. Secondly, these
children tend to display impatience with people who do not readily give them
everything they want.
Thirdly,
these children tend to display relatively poor social skills. They are less
likely than other children to be concerned with the welfare of others, or to
sacrifice their own needs.
Part
of the problem is that they expect their friends’ lives to revolve around
making them happy. Jackson, Henrikson, and Foshee (2007) observed that
permissive parenting style positively associated with academic success for
Asian and African Americans’ academic achievements but was not related to
European and Mexican Americans’ academic achievements.
In
one study, Dornbusch et al, (2007) found that parenting styles vary across
different cultures. Since parenting styles have varying characteristic across
cultures, this study sought to find out if permissive parenting style will have
a positive or negative influence on the academic performance of students in
Economics in mi Local Government Area.
2.4 Summary of Literature Review
Parenting
style is the method adopted by parents in their child rearing. Moreover, it is
the representation of how parents demand and respond to their children (Spera,
2005).
Parenting
styles have been categorized based on two dimensions, which are “responsiveness”
and “demandingness” (Baumrind, 2005). The combination of the level of
responsiveness and demandingness creates “authoritative and permissive style of
parenting”. Authoritative parenting style is much more democratic and the
parents are responsive to the children and will listen to questions.
Authoritative
parents provide directions and support to their children. They imposed
restrictions and are careful to provide reasons for the restrictions they
imposed and will ensure that the children follow these laid down procedures.
Several studies have shown that authoritative parenting style has a positive
influence on the academic performance of students (Steinberg, 2005; Dornbusch,
2005; Anne et al, 2008; Pong et al, 2005).
Permissive
parents on the other hand, do not expect mature behaviours from their children,
and often seem more like a friend than a parental figure. Several studies have
shown that permissive parenting style is negatively related to academic
achievement (Amato and Gilberth, 2000; Slicker, 2004; Dornbusch, Steinberg and
Brown, 2007).
Dornbusch
et al (2007) revealed that, all of the parenting styles have vary
characteristic across different cultures. That is why this study sought to
investigate whether authoritative style will result in high academic
performance and permissive with low academic performance.
INFLUENCE OF PARENTING STYLES ON THE ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF
STUDENTS IN GOVERNMENT
CHAPTER THREE
RESEARCH METHODS
This chapter present the
methodology used in the study as follows:
• Area of the study
• Research Design
• Population of the Study
• Sample and Sampling Technique
• Research Instrument
• Validation of the Instrument
• Method of Data Collection
• Method of Data Analysis
3.1 Area of the Study
3.2 Research
Design
The
research design adopted for this study was a survey research design. This is
because the study sought opinion, and intents from people.
3.3 Population
of the Study
The
Population of the study consisted of all senior secondary One to three
(SSI-SS3) Students from all the eight (8) public secondary schools in Etinan
Local Government Area Who offered Government as a subject. Therefore, the total
population for the study was 1542 students,
3.4 Sample
and Sampling Technique
Random
sampling technique was employed to choose one hundred and fifty (150) students
from five (5) selected secondary schools in the Local Government Area.
The
selected comprises of thirty (30) students from each of the secondary schools.
These 150 students sampled comprise male and female students respectively.
3.5 Research
Instruments
The
end of term examination scores and a questionnaire were used as instruments for
data collection. The questionnaire consisted often (10) items structured on the
four (4) point scale response of Strongly Agree (SA), Agree (A), Disagree (D)
and Strongly Disagree (SD).
The
questionnaire was structured in simple and clear sentences devoid of any
ambiguity. It consisted of two parts; first part (Section A) contains personal
data of the respondents, while the second part (Section B) contains the items
of the questionnaire for response. There are ten (10) items in the
questionnaire.
3.6 Validation of the Instrument
The
instrument was validated by the project supervisor to ensure that the items in
the instrument relates to the problem of the study. Corrections made by the
supervisor were integrated accordingly.
3.7 Method of Data Collection
The
questionnaire copies were distributed to the respondents by the researcher to
fill and return at their own pace. All the questionnaires administered were
received back. This gave a return rate of 100%. And the end of term examination
scores of the students was also used to compare their performances.
3.8 Method of Data Analysis
All
the data were analyzed using Pearson Product Moment Correlation (PPMC) to test
the Hypotheses.
CHAPTER FOUR
DATA PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION OF
FINDINGS
4.1 Data Analysis
Hypothesis 1:
There is no significant relationship between Authoritative parenting style and
good academic performance of students in Government.
Variables
|
N
|
∑x
∑y
|
∑x2
∑y2
|
∑xy
|
r-cal
|
r-crit
|
Decision
|
Academic Performance of students
|
150
|
336
|
22730
|
|
|
|
|
Authoritative
Parenting Style
|
|
|
|
18875
|
0.63
|
0.61
|
HO1
Reject
|
150
|
279
|
15827
|
|
|
|
|
Significant
at P. <0.05, df = 148
The table 1 above shows
that the r-calculated value of 0.63 is greater than the r-crit value of 0.165
at 0.05 level of significant at 148 degree of freedom. Based on the result, the
null hypothesis is rejected.
Hence, it was observed that
there is a significant relationship between authoritative parenting style and
good academic performance of students in Government in mi Local Government
Area.
Hypothesis
2:
There is no significant relationship between permissive parenting style and
poor academic performance of students in Government.
Table
II
Variables
|
N
|
∑x
∑y
|
∑x2
∑y2
|
∑xy
|
r-cal
|
r-crit
|
Decision
|
Academic Performance of students
|
150
|
336
|
26366
|
|
|
|
HO1
|
Permissive Parenting Style
|
|
|
|
22538
|
0.51
|
0.65
|
Reject
|
150
|
310
|
19430
|
|
|
|
|
Significant at P. <0.05, df 148
As
shown in table 2 above, r-calculated value is 0.51 which is greater the r-crit value
of 0.165 at 0.05 level of significant at 148 degree of freedom. Hence the null
hypothesis is rejected, indicating that there is a significant relationship
between permissive parenting style and poor academic performance of students in
Economic in mi Local Government Area.
4.2 Discussion of Findings
The
findings of the study as presented in table 1 above shows that there is a
significant relationship between authoritative parenting style and good
academic performance of students in Government in Etinan Local Government Area.
This
agrees with Dornbusch (2005) who observes that children raised by authoritative
parents, have higher level of academic performance in school.
Bank
(2004), also noted that poor or good academic performance of a child depends on
the style of parenting adopted by parents.
The
findings also reveal that there is a significant relationship between
permissive parenting style and poor academic performance of students in Government
in Etinan Local Government Area. It was revealed that Permissive-parenting
style is highly correlating with poor academic performance, while authoritative
parenting style is highly correlating with good academic performance.
This
agrees with Dornbusch (2005) who posited that children raised by authoritative
parents, when compared with those raised by permissive parents, have higher
level of academic performance in school.
Steinberg
et al, (2006) also found that children with permissive parents reported lower
grades in school performance than children with authoritative.
This
is in support of Ekanem (2004), who observes that the social climate or
environment in which a child finds his/herself to a large extent determines
his/her behaviour, personality and academic achievement.
CHAPTER FIVE
SUMMERY, RECOMMENDATION AND CONCLUSION
5.1 Summary
This
study was carried out to ascertain the influence of parenting styles on the
academic performance of students in Government. The study was conducted in mi
Local Government Area, Akwa born State. To achieve the purpose, two research
questions and two research hypotheses were formulated to guide the study. The
population of the study consisted of all 1 542 senior secondary one to three
(SS1 — SS3) Government students from all the eight (8) public secondary schools
in mi Local Government Area. Out of this number, one hundred and fifty (150)
students were selected from five (5) selected secondary schools in the Local
Government Area for the study using random sampling technique.
A
ten (10) item structured questionnaire and the end of term examination were
used as instruments for date collection. The data collected were analyzed using
Pearson Product Moment Correlation (PPMC).
From
the study, the analysis revealed that there is a significant relationship
between parenting styles and good or poor academic performance of students in Government,
It was also noted that authoritative parenting style is highly correlating with
good academic performance while permissive parenting style is highly
correlating with poor academic performance.
5.2 Recommendations
Based
on the result of the findings, the following recommendations were made:
(i)
Parents should adopt authoritative
parenting style in their homes.
(ii)
Parents should provide some guidelines
and rules in the house.
(iii)
Parents should always direct their
children’s activities and remind
them to do their homework.
(iv) Parents should care about their children’s
performance in school, and the
children should be motivated when they perform
well.
(v)
Sometimes, the parents should expect
matured behavior from the children.
5.3 Conclusion
Based
on the findings of the study, the following conclusions were drawn.
(i)
There is a significant relationship
between parenting styles and academic
performance of students in Government, because
education of a child begins from the home he/she comes from.
(ii)
Authoritative parenting style is the
best style of parenting because it
is associated with good academic performance.
(iii)
Permissive parenting style is
associated with poor academic performance,
because permissive parents do not care about their
children’s performance in school and they do not bother or remind their children to do their homework.
5.4 Suggestion
for Further Studies
Based
on the result of the findings, the following recommendations were made for
further studies:
(i)
Impact of parenting styles on child
development.
(ii)
Parenting styles and self-esteem.
REFERENCES
Amato,
P. R. and Giberth, J. G (2000). None resident father and children’s well-being:
A meta-analysis.
Anne, M. D, Samuels, J. F, Moffitt, T. E (2008). Adolescent
antisocial personality traits are associated with experiences of low parental
care. Act a psychiatrica scandinavica,
106, 126 — 133.
Bank,
S. K (2004). “Parenting practices, child Adjustment and family Diversity”. Journal of Marriage and family. 64 (3): 703.
Baumrind,
D. (2000) The influence of parenting style on adolescent competence and substance
use. Journal of Early Adolescent, 11, 56—
95.
Baumrind,
D. (2005), Current Patterns of parental authority. Development Psychology monograph, H, 1 -103.
Barber,
F. (2001). Development psychology: from
Infancy to Adulthood. NSW: Pearson Education. Australia.
Bornstein,
R. F. (2005). A Freudian construct lost and reclaimed: The psychodynamics of
personality pathology. Psychoanalytic
psychology, 23, 339 — 353.
Brown,
S. (2008). Child, Parents and contextual influences on perceived parenting
competence among parents of adolescent. Journal
of marriage and the family. 59, 345 — 362.
Blair,
S. L, and Qian, Z. (2002). Family and Asian students’ educational performance.
Darling,
N. (2000). Parenting style as context: An integrative model. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 3, 487 — 496.
Dodge,
K. A (2003). Social-cognitive mechanisms in the development of conduct disorder
and depression.
Dornbusch,
S. M (2007). Predicting overt and covert anti-social behaviours: Parent, Peers,
and homelessness. Journal of community
psychology. 38, 409-485.
Dornbusch,
S. M, Steinberg L. and Brown, S. (2007). The relation of parenting style to
adolescent school performance. Children
Development, 58, 1244-257.
Ekanem,
A. (2004). Parenting type and academic performance of students. A case of
selected secondary schools in Eastern Obolo Local Government Area.
Glasgow
et al (2005). Parenting styles, adolescents’ attributions, and educational
outcomes in five interogeneous high schools. Child Development, 68, 507-529.
Jackson,
C. L. (2006). The authoritative parenting index: Predicting health risk
behaviours among children and adolescents. Health
Education and behavior. 25 (3), 319— 337.
Jackson,
C. L, Henriksen, S and Foshee A. L. (2007). Dyadic parenting and children’s
externalizing symptoms. Family Relations,
58, 289-302.
Jacobs,
S. and Harvey, E. (2005). “Parenting Education”. In James J. Ponzetti Jr.
International Encyclopedia of Marriage and family. Gale, Farmington, USA.
Retrieved 13 October, 2014.
Patterson
G. R. (2005). A social learning approach: coercive family process. Castalia publishing company.
Steinberg,
L. (2005). Patterns of competence and adjustment among adolescents from
authoritative, and permissive families. Child
Development, 62, 1049-1065.
Udoh,
B. 0. (2004). Factors affecting academic performance of students. A case of
selected secondary schools in Etinan Local Government Area.
Vandell,
D. L. and Posner, J. K (2003). Harsh, firm and permissive parenting in
low-income families. Journal of family
issues, 19, 483-507.
Wilson,
T. D. (2005). The developing person through the lifespan. Worth publishers, p. 274 -307.
Interesting blog. Nice to read something like this. Its great.
ReplyDeleteAuthoritative Parenting